Unresolved
We still don’t know whether anyone at this organisation has actually used this technology — zero lived-experience observations exist.
Not yet answered
What are we missing?
HealthAratus Intelligence
Inne
Inne Intelligence
What the accumulated evidence, deployment record and lived experience actually show.
Intelligence lenses
Four ways of interrogating the same reality. Each changes the question, not the subject.
Do published findings about Inne match what happens in practice?
Public evidence
House Democrats accuse CMS official of misleading Congress under oath
Healthcare Dive
What we know · what we don’t
Everything here is open to being corrected by someone who has seen it first-hand.
What we still don’t know
Nobody has answered these yet. Your experience can help us understand what is happening.
Matters of record
Settled elsewhere. Context for reading the above, not something practice can confirm.
- 1 public external signal(s) across 1 source(s).Recorded by HealthAratus
Tool intelligence
What HealthAratus understands
HealthAratus currently understands Inne through regulatory records and external market activity.
- Category
- imaging_diagnostics
What HealthAratus is still learning
HealthAratus is beginning to understand Inne. As evidence and experience accumulate, what remains unclear will be stated here.
Evidence & claims
What this is built on
The material the questions above were built from, with its attribution.
Inne is a device that monitors progesterone levels through daily saliva testing. It provides users with information about their fertility cycles.
Stated capabilities
The vendor’s own claims. Testable where practice can actually test them.
Stated capability
The device monitors progesterone levels using saliva samples.
According to Inne
Does this change your workflow?
Independent and public evidence
Found in public sources. Not a clinician’s experience, and never presented as one.
Recent change
House Democrats accuse CMS official of misleading Congress under oath
According to Healthcare Dive
Have you noticed this shift?
Company participation
Not yet verified
A record of the reality forming around this technology already exists. No representative of the company has verified participation yet.
Claim your company profileReference
The stable facts, for interpreting everything above.
Overview
What it does
• Inne's Minilab is a CE-certified, non-invasive device that enables daily progesterone monitoring through saliva testing, offering personalized fertility insights without hormonal side effects. It provides accurate cycle analysis without the need for blood draws. The device is compact, portable, and user-friendly,…
Vendor & external product information, not independently verified by HealthAratus
Where it's used
Deployed in home settings, Europe, United Kingdom
Key strength
Regulatory: CE-certified for fertility monitoring and hormone-free contraception, Approved as an in-vitro diagnostic device for self-testing, Clinically validated with a 92% effectiveness rate
Key capabilities
Non-invasive daily progesterone monitoring via saliva testing, CE-certified for fertility tracking and hormone-free contraception, Compact and portable design for ease of use
Clinical use cases
Daily monitoring of progesterone levels for fertility tracking, Hormone-free contraception method with 92% effectiveness, Personalized cycle analysis without hormonal side effects
Who uses it
Women seeking non-invasive fertility tracking, Individuals desiring hormone-free contraception, Couples planning for pregnancy
How the reality here has changed
Not enough recorded activity across time yet to describe how the reality here has moved. As accounts of Inne accumulate, this becomes a record of how the reality moved rather than a snapshot of one moment.
Across the category
Inne against the rest of Imaging & Diagnostics
Category intelligence reads this as Established. A sample of peers, not a census of the category.
Where Inne may differ
Differences in what we have recorded. Never a ranking, never a quality judgement.
No first-hand account has been recorded for Inne or for any peer we sampled in this category.
A gap across the whole category, not a fact about this technology.
Two readings that disagree
- Category intelligence reads clinical reality here as "Expanding", yet no first-hand account appears in the systems we sampled. Both readings are shown rather than reconciled.
Used another system in Imaging & Diagnostics? How does your experience compare?
A comparison across two systems tests the category, not just one product.
Connected intelligence
Category intelligence